Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Blog Article
refers to a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is often pricey and hard to attain.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that when taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should think about the advantage of each of the suitable candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found for being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part from the respondent department.
Some pluralist systems, which include Scots law in Scotland and types of civil regulation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, don't exactly fit into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may have been greatly influenced via the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted in the civil legislation tradition.
Online access on the case management system to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases could possibly be searched using name or case number.
two. I have read the realized counsel to the parties and also uncovered DPG at size, perused the record and noticed that:-
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and balance. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Except if case is tried(Bail Matters)
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and spend fixation will not be entertainable for the reasons that these kinds of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as a result this petition is dismissed, which will involve disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is just not inside of a position to dilate upon this sort of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be here withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.